|
"Bunker Hunt—Silver—China"
Twenty-five years ago I was in London when the famous journalist
of The New York Times, Floyd Norris, called me to comment
on Mr. Hunt's plan to float bonds against his silver holdings.
We were then talking about $4 billion worth of silver which
was supposed to shake up the financial markets.
The other day I had the opportunity to speak a few words with
Mr. Hunt. He still has a lively interest in silver and I managed
to slip in a few questions about his current life and the
world twenty-five years later.
I asked Mr. Hunt, "Did he foresee that major surplus
countries would invest their money in gold or silver simply
as a substitute currency?"
His answer was no. Negative. He said he invested in silver
because he didn't trust the government. He didn't trust hyperinflation
and he wanted to store money so that his buying power would
not diminish.
For twenty-five years actually, not many people spoke of silver.
For the same time period, actually there were only three years
that people talked of gold and gold related financial assets
at a governmental level.
As a securities analyst for forty years, I made the observation
that just as the silver market of the late '70s produced two
starring figures, Bunker Hunt and his brother Herbert Hunt,
the gold market in the last five years produced a young Canadian,
Robert McEwen, who built up Goldcorp., the third largest gold
company in North America, and now he's starting again building
a smaller gold company (much smaller), U.S. Gold with a market
cap of about $100 million.
Going even further, fifteen years before Bunker Hunt, the
world produced the late Edmund Safra, the Chairman of Republic
National Bank, who created the Euro dollar market.
The common denominator of the three monies is that they have
sort of a diversification of savings assets, whether it's
Euro dollars, silver or gold--a move away from conventional
currencies. Modern day bartender in the 20th century may be
the real currency of 2010 or 2025!
It is curious to me that today there are more and more gold
experts, more predictions, more consolidation on a worldwide
basis in gold and nobody is talking about silver.
Quietly, new crisis is being built.
It is in official statistics that China is producing 64 million
ounces of silver a year, the fourth largest silver producer
in the world. However, the overall position of China and silver
demand is heading towards a crisis that is manifold greater
than what happened in Bunker Hunt's time. The Chinese had
a surplus of 19 million ounces of silver in 2004, down from
26 million in 2001. It is estimated that today the surplus
is about 3.2 million.
The silver demand in the Far East could be as much as $150
million in two years which at the $10 level represents a value
of $1.5 billion.
Compare it to 1980: Mr. Hunt at any one time did not have
more than $4 billion invested in silver. It has created an
almost tenfold increase in price. In 1975, there was no question
that any government would put money to silver as a storage
of value.
In 2005, both the Chinese and the Russian governments have
publicly stated that they are increasing their gold reserves.
Now we are talking about government money.
The Chinese have $800 billion surplus capital at the government
level and the Russian well over $100 billion. Very soon we
are talking about $1 trillion.
If, besides the public and jewelry buyers, the Chinese alone
decide to put $10 billion to silver (which is 2.5 times the
size of the all-time record Hunt silver holding), we are talking
about the silver market that we are lucky if it will stabilize
at the $50 level.
We are actually talking about asset redeployment at the governmental
level. In late 2005 many governments talk about asset redeployment
as government money. We haven't as yet heard the asset redeployment
in silver is government surpluses.
Scientists are often credited to foresee the future of what
they create. Albert Einstein created the theory of relativity
in the 1920s and only twenty years later did President Franklin
Roosevelt set up the Manhattan Project. Edward Teller thought
about antinuclear forces and nuclear power in the early 70s
and twenty years later, President Reagan set up the Star Wars.
What really started with the Hunt Brothers original idea of
personal, family asset redeployment, twenty years ago became
government policy at the highest level in some of the most
powerful countries in the world.
In five or ten years time, we will be talking about gold and
silver backed government bonds, just like we talk about Treasuries.
The biggest leverage at the moment is not gold, but silver.
It is highly unlikely that gold will go up to $2,000 in five
years. But it is perfectly normal to believe that silver may
go to $40 in five years.
Perhaps Bunker Hunt's dream has come true.
The truth of the matter is that in 1979, I did write a short
article called "Gold and the Polish Debt." The late
Governor John Connelly made a speech (partially with my help)
that America should tell the Poles to stop coming here for
refinancing their debt. Go to your friends, the Soviet Union.
We want cash. In this article, I had a sentence, "If
gold backing is required, maybe the Hunt Brother's dream will
come true." And I recommend Bunker Hunt for Nobel Prize
for Economics.
In Thanksgiving 2005, I repeat my recommendation. Bunker Hunt,
his family, who foresaw one of the greatest monetary change
in history should be granted a Nobel Prize for Economics.
To put it in a historical perspective twenty-five years ago,
the Hunt Brothers discovered the necessity of asset redeployment
to precious metals for paper currency.
Twenty-five years later Mr. Putin and China have joined the
club. History will remember Bunker and Herbert Hunt and the
Chinese Prime Minister with Mr. Putin who have opened up the
way for nations, for individuals to buy into the new currencies
of money that governments fail to control.
(Article
14 - posted November 28, 2005)
e-mail: mlikar@aol.com
Home |
Biography | Links | Contact
All Content &
Articles of This Web Site
© 2005-2006 Andrew G.
Racz |